BCDR Tabletop AAR Template
Use this after-action report template for BCDR tabletop exercises to document lessons learned, remediation plans, and audit-ready evidence.
BCDR Tabletop AAR Template
What is a BCDR Tabletop AAR?
A Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery (BCDR) Tabletop After-Action Report (AAR) documents the outcomes of tabletop exercises. It captures lessons learned, identifies gaps, and creates remediation plans for audit-ready evidence.
Tabletop exercises simulate disaster scenarios without real disruption. AARs ensure exercises produce actionable improvements and demonstrate compliance to auditors, regulators, and stakeholders.
Why AARs Matter for Compliance
BCDR tabletop exercises fail to deliver value without thorough AARs. Auditors require evidence that exercises identify issues and drive remediation. AARs transform exercises into compliance artifacts that prove your BCDR program works.
Without AARs, organizations repeat mistakes, fail audits, and risk operational disruptions during real incidents.
AAR Template Structure
Executive Summary
Exercise Date: [Date]
Scenario: [Brief description, e.g., “Ransomware attack encrypting primary data center”]
Participants: [List roles, e.g., IT Manager, BC Coordinator, Executive Team]
Overall Assessment: [Pass/Fail rating with justification]
Key Findings:
- [Bullet point summary of major issues and successes]
- [Quantitative metrics, e.g., “Response time: 45 minutes (target: 30 minutes)”]
Exercise Overview
Objectives:
- Test incident response plan effectiveness
- Validate communication protocols
- Assess recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO)
- Identify gaps in resources or procedures
Scenario Details:
- Trigger Event: [e.g., “Malware detected on file server at 9:00 AM”]
- Scope: [Systems affected, e.g., “Primary database, email, customer portal”]
- Assumptions: [e.g., “No physical damage, key personnel available”]
Timeline:
- 9:00 AM: Incident detected via SIEM alert
- 9:15 AM: Incident response team assembled
- 9:45 AM: Decision to isolate affected systems
- 10:30 AM: Recovery procedures initiated
- 11:30 AM: Services restored
Detailed Findings
Strengths
| Area | Description | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Communication | Team assembled quickly via emergency notification system | Call logs, participant feedback |
| Decision Making | Clear escalation path followed | Meeting notes, decision documentation |
| Resource Availability | Backup systems activated within RTO | System logs, monitoring data |
Areas for Improvement
| Issue | Description | Impact | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Response Time | 45-minute delay in team assembly | Extended downtime | High |
| Backup Access | Difficulty accessing offsite backups | Data loss risk | High |
| Vendor Coordination | Slow response from cloud provider | Recovery delays | Medium |
| Communication Gaps | External stakeholders not notified promptly | Reputational risk | Medium |
Remediation Plan
Immediate Actions (Next 30 Days)
| Action Item | Owner | Due Date | Resources Needed | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Update emergency contact list | BC Coordinator | 2024-03-15 | HR database access | 100% contacts verified |
| Test backup access procedures | IT Manager | 2024-03-20 | Offsite facility visit | Successful access in <15 minutes |
| Train team on faster assembly | Training Lead | 2024-03-25 | Online training module | 90% completion rate |
Short-Term Improvements (3-6 Months)
| Action Item | Owner | Due Date | Resources Needed | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implement automated notifications | IT Manager | 2024-05-15 | Alert system upgrade | <5 minute assembly time |
| Enhance vendor contracts | Procurement | 2024-06-01 | Legal review | SLA improvements |
| Conduct full-scale exercise | BC Coordinator | 2024-06-30 | External facilitator | All objectives met |
Long-Term Enhancements (6-12 Months)
| Action Item | Owner | Due Date | Resources Needed | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upgrade backup systems | CTO | 2024-08-15 | Budget approval | RTO reduced to 2 hours |
| Develop communication templates | Marketing | 2024-09-01 | Stakeholder input | Templates tested in exercise |
| Annual exercise cadence | BC Coordinator | 2024-12-31 | Calendar integration | Exercises completed quarterly |
Participant Feedback
Quantitative Ratings (1-5 Scale)
| Aspect | Average Rating | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Scenario Realism | 4.2 | “Felt authentic, good use of recent threats” |
| Facilitation | 4.5 | “Clear objectives, good time management” |
| Resource Availability | 3.8 | “Some confusion on backup access” |
| Communication | 4.0 | “Internal comms good, external needs work” |
| Overall Value | 4.3 | “Identified real gaps, actionable outcomes” |
Qualitative Feedback
- “Exercise revealed our backup procedures aren’t as robust as we thought.”
- “Team performed well under pressure, but we need better documentation.”
- “Vendor response times were a surprise—need to renegotiate SLAs.”
- “Good cross-functional participation; helped build relationships.”
Lessons Learned
What Went Well
- Incident detection and initial triage were effective
- Decision-making followed established protocols
- Team demonstrated good collaboration across departments
What Didn’t Go Well
- Delayed team assembly due to outdated contact lists
- Unfamiliarity with backup access procedures
- Lack of predefined communication templates for stakeholders
Key Takeaways
- Regular contact list maintenance is critical
- Backup procedures need hands-on testing, not just documentation
- External communication planning requires more attention
- Exercises should include vendor participation
Appendices
Appendix A: Exercise Agenda
- Welcome and objectives (15 min)
- Scenario briefing (15 min)
- Initial response discussion (30 min)
- Recovery planning (45 min)
- Stakeholder communication (30 min)
- Debrief and lessons learned (30 min)
Appendix B: Participant List
- John Smith, IT Manager
- Jane Doe, BC Coordinator
- Bob Johnson, Executive Sponsor
- Alice Brown, Communications Lead
- [Additional participants]
Appendix C: Supporting Documents
- Incident Response Plan v2.1
- Business Continuity Strategy
- Contact List (pre-exercise)
- Exercise Scenario Document
- Meeting Notes and Transcripts
How to Use This Template
Step 1: Customize for Your Exercise
Replace placeholders with your specific scenario, participants, and findings. Add organization-specific sections if needed.
Step 2: Gather Data During Exercise
Assign note-takers for timeline tracking, decisions, and issues. Collect feedback immediately after.
Step 3: Complete Within 48 Hours
Draft the AAR while details are fresh. Include all participants in review for accuracy.
Step 4: Distribute and Track
Share with executive sponsors, implement remediation plans, and track progress quarterly.
Step 5: Prepare for Audits
Store AARs in your compliance evidence library. Reference them in SOC 2 or ISO 27001 submissions.
Common AAR Mistakes
Organizations undermine tabletop value by:
- Skipping AARs: Exercises become pointless without documentation
- Being too vague: Include specific actions, owners, and timelines
- Ignoring feedback: Quantitative ratings without qualitative insights
- Not tracking remediation: AARs must drive real improvements
- Poor distribution: Limit to exercise participants; share broadly
Next Steps
Need help with BCDR tabletop exercises? Bell Tower designs scenarios, facilitates exercises, and produces audit-ready AARs.
Frequently Asked Questions
How soon after an exercise should I complete the AAR?
Within 48 hours while details are fresh. Delay reduces accuracy and actionability.
Who should participate in tabletop exercises?
Include IT, business leaders, communications, legal, and external stakeholders. 8-12 participants ideal.
How often should we conduct tabletop exercises?
Annually minimum, quarterly for high-risk organizations. Align with compliance requirements.
What makes a good exercise scenario?
Realistic threats based on your risk assessment. Include technical failures, cyber attacks, natural disasters.
How do AARs support compliance?
They provide evidence of testing and improvement. Reference in SOC 2 CC9.1 or ISO 27001 A.17.1.3 submissions.